fa-printPrint
Home

Section 38 of the Road Traffic Act 1994 - Active Travel Scheme - Cleveragh Drive, Sligo Town - Municipal District of Sligo-Strandhill

Submitted Submissions

Comments on Active Travel Interventions for Cleaveragh

Submitted: 04.08.2025 - 12:12pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-1
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 1
Author: Rory Noone
Date Created: 04.08.2025 - 12:02pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    FAO: Sligo Country Council

    Active Travel Interventions in Cleaveragh

     

    I wish to make a submission as a Tonaphubble resident regarding the proposed Active Travel Intervention scheme for Cleaveragh, currently in public consultation. While I welcome the safety measures introduced, the enormous scale of the project is totally out of proportion to the stated benefits.

    Some stated goals of Sligo County Council are to improve “the current facilities for both pedestrians and cyclists”, to “encourage active travel”, “improve connectivity” and to reduce the “environmental impact”.

    The solution, in a nutshell, is to

    1. Widen the space allocated to vehicular traffic (from approx. 4.5m to 6.5m).
    2. Add safety measures and accessibility (crossings, lighting, traffic calming, protected cyclepaths)

    Resulting in

    1. Removal of broad swathes of mature oak, beech trees and others
    2. Removal of wildlife habitats

     

    Please consider the concerns and questions and suggestions that I have listed below.

     

    1. How will an 800m stretch of footpath and cyclepath “improve connectivity”?

    I am active cyclist and participate in a local school cycle bus. The proposed scheme connects the Sligo Sports Complex with Tonaphubble Road, a road that has no cyclepath whatsoever. Cyclepaths, especially in the context of active travel, should be first built where they are most useful. Since the purported objective is to promote active travel, adding protected cyclepaths to the Tonaphubble Road and the Cleaveragh Road should be the highest priority since these are main corridors into the town from residential areas.

     

     

    2. How does the removal of the trees and wildlife habitats “encourage active travel”?

    Cleaveragh Drive is a unique and beautiful location in Sligo, with mature canopies and a sense that you are in the countryside. Many people walk and run along this road because of this factor alone. Nobody wants to walk in a barren landscape. By removing the trees from the roadside, you are removing the very aspects that make it so appealing for walking and running. The effect may actually be to diminish active travel.

     

     

    3. What is the total cost of this scheme to improve “the current facilities for both pedestrians and cyclists”?

    Cycling on the Cleaveragh Drive is currently extremely dangerous especially when travelling from the racecourse uphill to Tonaphubble Road. The paint for cycle lanes has worn away and there are bends where cars often overrun these invisible lines. To improve the facilities for cyclists, to make it actually useable for cyclists, why not enforce speed limits and protect the existing cycle paths? Put the budget instead towards the development of a town-wide active travel network, on the principal of developing where it will have the greatest impact and tap into the highest latent demand.

     

     

    4. How will an 800m stretch of cyclepath and footpath “reduce air and noise pollution, greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption” as part of the “environmental impact”?

    The Public Consultation pamphlet says that the scheme will provide a “safe future link from the ATU to Tonaphubble”. Why would a cyclist or walker coming from Tonaphubble take this route to the bridge when it is much faster to take a route along Devins Drive? In fact, it is more than twice as fast to take the Devins Road route when measured from the corner of Tonaphubble Road and Cleaveragh Drive. Speaking as a cyclist, few will choose a much longer way around on a daily commute.

    Or are the Council suggesting perhaps that the Cleaveragh Drive is the principal route for all traffic coming across the new bridge? If so, put the active travel budget towards Devins Drive and Cleaveragh Road where it will have a real, and not an imagined, impact.

     

    Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) acknowledge the reality of the Induced Demand phenomenon, where additional infrastructure induces more vehicular traffic. In the context of the likely enormously negative environmental impact of the Eastern Garavogue Bridge (EGB) scheme it is whimsical for the council to tout the environment benefits of this inadequate Active Travel Scheme. And that is, when allowing a generous assumption that there are any positive environmental benefits at all.

     

    5. Why create an isolated 50m stretch of isolated cyclepath on Tonaphubble Road?

    Every cyclepath on the drawing on Page 6 peters out immediately beyond the borders of the drawing. What use to anyone is a 50m stretch of protected cyclepath when there are dangers before and after?

    The drawings suggest substantial development on the southern side of Tonaphubble Road but the existing lay-by is not included in the drawings so the impact cannot be assessed. Please include this in the drawings. How can local residents make informed submissions on this proposed change without this information?

     

    6. What is the impact of the planned EGB on traffic volumes on Cleaveragh Drive?

    How can local residents assess the Cleaveragh Active Travel scheme without knowing the projected traffic volumes against current volumes, the composition of that traffic (HGVs vs cars), the congestion at peak times etc. as a result of the new bridge? Again, how can local residents make informed submissions on the suitability of the Cleaveragh Active Travel Interventions without this information?

     

    Suggestions

    Include EGB traffic impact assessments relevant to Cleaveragh Drive along with the public information on the Cleaveragh Active Travel Scheme.

    Prioritize first the most useful parts of a town-wide Active Travel network

    Protect the beauty of amenity we currently have and love

    Enforce the existing speed limits on Cleaveragh Drive

    Convert the cyclepaths on Cleaveragh Drive into protected cyclepaths

     

    To summarise, the scale of the project and the details of the proposed changes themselves are out of proportion to, and sometime directly contradict the stated benefits of the project. Local residents should receive more information in relation to the costs and a justification for both the scale of the project and the destruction of a local amenity.

     

    Respectfully,

    Rory Noone

Attachments

  • fa-file-wordSLG-C67-1-13445 - Active Travel Proposal Comments.docx

Cleveragh Drive Active Travel Consultation

Submitted: 04.08.2025 - 1:23pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-2
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 0
Author: Carraroe and District Regeneration Association
Date Created: 04.08.2025 - 01:12pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    image-20250804131755-1.png Carraroe and District Regeneration Association 

     

    Submission re Cleveragh Drive  Active Travel Scheme Consultation

     

    Carraroe and District Regeneration Association represents people in the Carraroe and Pearse Road area including housing estates such as Greenfort, Woodstown Lodge, Ferndale, Markievicz Heights, Rathanna, Oaklawn, wishing to access the Cleveragh recreational area by active travel means.

    We are concerned the Carraroe to Garda Station Pathfinder Project currently being developed does not appear to have a seamless link with this project to ensure a continuous safe segregated system to Cleveragh Park for residents from Carraroe etc to this facility as well as the regional sports complex. Evidence demonstrates that segregated cycling/ walking systems in other areas facilitates greater usage.

    As you will know Carraroe people living in the Aughamore Area can travel via Holywell Road. We welcome the plan to have a controlled junction to allow people safely join the Cleveragh Avenue. Speed is an issue which from the plans has calming measures calming measures to allow people cross safely to the Park . It is unsafe at present for children cycling and walking.

    Currently Pearse Road, Carraroe, Cemetery Rd  Cleveragh Avenue are very busy with cars and HGVs on their way to Dunnes Stores, ALDI, Lidl , Retail Park and the increased danger for vulnerable road users once the Eastern Garavogue Bridge is built is a serious concern for the future This is likely to become a route of choice for people travelling to other major services like ATU, Sligo General, Markievicz House etc. and one wonders what provision is being made in the plan for the area for such increase in traffic .

    Cleveragh Park:

    While we note the date for submission on this is closed its is essential that senior planning management in Sligo Council adopt a more overall integrated approach to such planning. As you can understand submissions on these consultations have a impact on the park and the park development on this aspect. We note no provision is being made in the park for Toilets    or connections to wastewater systems which into the future is a short-term approach and not in long term interest of the area.

    Dog Parks: While such spaces are welcome looking at the plan it appears there is  a very large space being dedicated to this facility and while agree with the provision one must question if the spaces need to be so large. 

    The upgrade plan for Cleveragh Park, which includes a proposal for 90 extra car-parking spaces will bring extra car traffic to this area. One must question the idea of providing so many car parking spaces in the park when bus service to the area would be more appropriate.

    Bus Services:

    As you will be aware we have submitted a proposals for  the development of Sligo Town Bus service which  must be considered when planning any development involving traffic including cycling and walking. If the proposal were implemented then such would enhance the overall impact on traffic in Sligo Town  

    Summary:

    We welcome all efforts to provide safe segregated Walking and Cycling systems in Sligo and recognise the previous lack of long-term planning which currently presents many challenges to providing such facilities on our narrow roads. The provision of a local frequent bus service, with cycle carrying facilities as is available in other countries, for Sligo Town community can enhance and assist the development of Active Travel Systems and needs to considered in development of all means of travel including active travel by the management of Sligo County Council. This integrated approach will ensure most advantage and added value can be taken of existing active travel facilities in our County 

    Proposal submitted by Carraroe and District Regeneration Association re Sligo Town Bus Service

    Background:

    We as a community group interested in promoting an environmentally friendly approach to developing our community have campaigned for five years to have Sligo Town Bus Service provided to Carraroe. However, as we have considered the idea, we have developed our thinking especially in light of the serious debate that has occurred in the past number of years on Climate Change and need to reduce our carbons to meet the targets set for our Country.

    County Sligo Population:

    County Sligo has a current population of 66,000 (2016) and Sligo Town area which we refer to in this proposal represents approx. 48% of County Sligo population.                                                                                                                                    

    Existing Carparks:

    There exist public car parks in the following areas on periphery of Sligo Town: Carraroe, Calry, Rathcormack/Druncliff, Ransboro, Rosses Point and Strandhill which can facilitate the provision of a spoke wheel service to each of these areas and could facilitate an availability to more extended population to park their cars and take the bus into Sligo Town Centre.

    Student Population Travel Arrangements:

    The new Technological University (Sligo AT) has a population in excess of 5000 students many who live around the areas referred in this proposal who can avail of such a service and benefit from the new reduced fares provided by Government should the Sligo Town Bus Service be provided. Each of the areas referred has a National School with sixth class graduates transitioning to the five second level Schools that exist within the Sligo Town Centre. The provision of the proposed service would allow students use such Public Transport to travel to Schools rather than the current position of parents delivering/collecting by car.  

     

    Illustration of our proposal:

     

    image-20250804131755-2.png

     

    As already indicated, we have as a voluntary group developed our thinking to reach the model as outlined and illustrated in the above diagram and suggest the following principles must be incorporated to ensure people leave the car and take public transport.

    • Bus should run on each indicated line and all buses be timed to meet in Town Centre so people can change bus and join one to next destination.
    • Bus Service must be frequent at minimum every half hour but each fifteen minutes would be more attractive. 
    • Bus journeys must be as short as possible within the constraint of reaching the majority of population on the route.
    • Bus standard must be similar to existing Bus providing the Sligo Town Service
    • Bus with similar standard to existing service but half the size/ capacity would be sufficient and may be more efficient /cost effective. 
    • Bus must be pollution free and powered by electric battery systems
    • Timetables must be computerised and designed by logistics experts
    • The Strandhill service must be timed to meet the arrival and departure of trains at Sligo Train Station to facilitate people using train network to Sligo
    • The service needs to be provided from 6 am to 11pm seven days per week to allow people use public transport to and from work, school and other social and business activities.
    • Mobile App must have time table messaging systems   or have stops provided with timed information systems similar to existing in Dublin.

    Tourism /Community Benefits:

    • The concept of a frequent reliable integrated timed service provided as per the model outlined has many benefits form an income generation and marketing Sligo as an attractive location to visit without the necessity of a car.
    • Such Bus service should have a bicycle lift attached to facilitate people who wish to have a bicycle available to explore and cycle in location.
    • The service with a linked timed hub and spoke approach opens the following facilities to people by public transport thereby removing need for car usage
    • All Hotels Restaurants.
    • Drumcliffe Church and Yeats Grave at Drumcliffe.
    • Established Walking Trails.
    • Surf Centre at Strandhill,
    • Carrowmore Megalithic Cemetery Visitor Centre,
    • Strandhill Golf Club, Rugby Club
    •  Neolithic Tombs on Cairns Hill,
    •  Lough Gill Tour boat,
    • Water Glades with its leisure facilities,
    • Tobernault Holywell,
    • Dooney Rock,
    • Developing Specialist Hotel Disability Friendly facility at Cregg House
    • Rosses Point Golf Club, Yacht Club.
    • Hazelwood House Tourism Centre
    • Football facilities including Sligo Rovers Centre, Sligo Sports Complex, GAA Centre of Excellence Cumeen, Markievicz Park Pearse Rd , Local Football Clubs in Area   

     

    Costs:

    • We recognise the development will require extra resources including extra buses, staff and running costs etc and will require expertise to cost. 
    • However, we would suggest the benefits to our community and the environment is major and will in years ahead, assist the 48% population which this proposal serves, change their approach to travelling by public transport.
    • We need to be bold and ambitious in our approach to developing our approach to Climate Change and this proposal can be a leadership/ demonstration site for the future and other areas.
    • Research on impact will be a central requirement to ensure it is meeting the targets.

    Incentives to Change: 

    It is appropriate, when such a service is available, to provide incentives to use the Bus Service.

    • Sligo County Council should review its parking charges and increase its short-term parking costs in Town Centre to encourage people to take the bus into Town Centre.
    • Long term parking should remain so visitors and non-residents in areas listed can park in Sligo Town Centre at reasonable costs.
    • Further parking spaces should not be provided as it only encourages people to drive to Town instead of taking a bus.
    • A system of redeeming bus tickets in shops etc may be an option with Council via Department funding reimbursing the business may be worthy of examination. 

       Summary:

    • We are confident this approach to service provision will benefit and be of major assistance to people of this area. It will reduce the need to travel by car to Sligo City for a large number of residents and will allow our population avail of an efficient service.
    • It will allow our elderly remain independent in terms of accessing other services like GPs, Hospitals, Day Services, Social   activities into old age with obvious benefits in terms of wellbeing and dependency on residential care
    • The concepts as outlined support the need from an economic, social, community and carbon footprint perspective.
    • The existence of a public carparks available to serve the proposal we believe provides serious economic advantage to the proposal in terms of providing for a wider area around County Sligo.

    We trust our observations will be given serious integrated consideration

    Kind Regards

     

     

     

In support of the Active Travel Scheme for Cleveragh Drive

Submitted: 06.08.2025 - 8:02pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-3
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 0
Author: Risteard Cooney
Date Created: 06.08.2025 - 07:59pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • I would like to express my strong support for the proposed Active Travel Scheme improvements along Cleveragh Drive. Improving active travel and introducing the better traffic calming measures will make the area safer for all users in particular children, the elderly and people with disabilities.
    The improved infrastructure is great for people living in the local area but it will also encourage and enable more people from further distances in the town to cycle or walk to the swimming pool, Cleveragh and Doorly Park. This is particularly important to improve the take-up of active travel in the town.

Comments on Cleveragh Active Travel interventions

Submitted: 07.08.2025 - 2:20pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-4
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 0
Author: Marie Casserly Casserly
Date Created: 07.08.2025 - 02:16pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    Submission on the Cleveragh Drive Active Travel Scheme

    To: Active Travel Section, Sligo County Council

    Subject: Submission on Proposed Cleveragh Drive Active Travel Scheme

    Date: 7/8/2025

    Introduction

    I welcome the overall aim of the Cleveragh Drive Active Travel Scheme to improve walking and cycling facilities in Sligo and support Sligo County Council’s ongoing commitment to sustainable transport. The proposal includes many positive elements such as segregated infrastructure and an attractive route. However, I would like to make several constructive suggestions to enhance the safety, usability, and long-term success of the scheme.

    Specific Recommendations

    Cycle Track Width

    The proposed cycle path appears to be approximately 1.5 m wide in places, which is below recommended standards for a two-way track.

    Recommendation: Increase the width to a minimum of 2 m to allow for safe passing, particularly at bends or pinch points.

    Bus Stop Integration

    The current design suggests the cycle track diverts behind bus stops without adequate buffer space.

    Recommendation: Provide physical separation (buffer zone) between the bus stop waiting area and the cycle track to protect both cyclists and passengers.

    Merge Areas and Line Markings

    The use of “Cycle Track Ends” signage and merge arrows is unclear and potentially unsafe. Recommendation: Replace these with clear transition markings that are intuitive and consistent with National Cycle Manual guidance for merging zones.

    Continuous Footpaths at Side Entrances

    Side road crossings currently use yellow box markings or yield symbols that weaken pedestrian and cyclist priority.

    Recommendation: Implement continuous footpath and cycle track treatments across minor entrances and driveways to reinforce pedestrian and cyclist priority, as per DMURS best practices.

    Appropriate Crossing Types

    The proposed signalised crossings may be excessive for minor road entries.

    Recommendation: Consider zebra or parallel pedestrian/cyclist crossings where traffic volumes and speeds allow, especially near the sports centre entrance.

    Correct Cycling Flow Direction

    Some sections appear to be laid out as if cycling were on the right, which conflicts with standard Irish practice.

    Recommendation: Realign cycle flow so that it remains consistent with left-side travel conventions throughout.

    Removal of Footpath Logos

    Proposed painted logos on footpaths may clutter the visual environment and confuse users. Recommendation: Remove these logos in favour of standard wayfinding signage.

    Roadway Width Reduction

    The current cross-section allocates excessive width to the vehicular roadway (up to 3.25 m lanes).

    Recommendation: Narrow lanes slightly (e.g., to 3.0 m) to reduce traffic speeds and reallocate space for cycle buffers or wider tracks.

    Simplify Crossing Geometry

    Some crossings (e.g., near Tonaphubble Road) are overly squared-off, creating longer and less natural routes for pedestrians and cyclists.

    Recommendation: Simplify crossing alignments to provide more direct, comfortable routes with good sightlines.

    Line Markings on Cycle Track

    Solid white lines along the cycle track may cause confusion for two-way travel and hinder natural positioning by riders.

    Recommendation: Use dashed lines where necessary or remove central markings altogether on narrower paths.

    Conclusion

    This project has strong potential to improve active travel in Sligo. By making the above adjustments, Sligo County Council can deliver a scheme that is safer, more inclusive, and future-proofed to accommodate increasing levels of walking and cycling.

    Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback.

    Yours sincerely,

    Marie Casserly.

     

     

Comments on Cleveragh Avenue Active Travel Scheme

Submitted: 07.08.2025 - 4:24pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-5
Boundaries Captured on Map: Yes
No. of documents attached: 1
Author: Conall Doran
Date Created: 07.08.2025 - 04:16pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    I have examined the proposal for the Cleveragh Active Travel Scheme and made comments.  These are in the enclosed PDF file.

Attachments

  • fa-file-pdfSLG-C67-5-13496 - Cleveragh Avenue Submission.pdf

Cleveragh Drive AT

Submitted: 08.08.2025 - 9:50am
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-6
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 1
Author: Aisling Heraughty
Date Created: 08.08.2025 - 09:48am
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    Please see attached

Attachments

  • fa-file-wordSLG-C67-6-13962 - Cleveragh Drive AT - Redacted.docx

Support for Cleveragh Avenue Active Travel

Submitted: 08.08.2025 - 3:05pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-7
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 9
Author: Sligo Cycling Campaign
Date Created: 05.08.2025 - 08:09am
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    Sligo Cycling Campaign is pleased to support the Cleveragh Avenue Active Travel Scheme with some reservations as to the current preliminary design. Our support is based on the following rationale

    Access to the Recreational Area: At present people living in the Carraroe and Upper Pearse Road  area including housing estates such as Greenfort, Woodtown Lodge, Ferndale, Markievicz Heights, Rathanna, Oaklawn, Heather View, Tonaphubble  and Meadowvale who want o access the Cleveragh recreational area by active means  have a partially safe route.  There is a permeability route via Markievicz Heights, Heather View and Meadowvale, as far as Holy Well Road.   However when people reach the junction  of Holy Well Road and Cleveragh Avenue there is no pedestrian crossing. Once across the road people walking do have a footpath all the way to the Sports Centre. If they wish to cross over to the Park there is a controlled crossing, but the speed of traffic is such it can still be an unpleasant experience so the proposal for pedestrian and cycling priority here is very welcome,

    Cycling Access:  Anyone cycling this route only has a painted cycle lane to protect them from traffic until they are some metres past the entrance to the Racecourse. From that point on there is a protected cycle lane on the opposite side of the road but there is no safe crossing. Traffic moving in the same direction downhill goes very fast while traffic coming uphill is concealed by the bend.  On the return trip people cycling can use the protected section of cycle lane until about 40 metres before the Woodland School entrance, then once again they only have paint, and in fact much of it has worn away. Paint is not protection and only separation of people cycling from heavy and fast moving traffic will provide safety and enable cycling by those who currently feel it is an unsafe activity.

    Low cycling numbers are not a justification for maintaining the status quo: As a consequence of the unsafe infrastructure not many people cycle this route and our members who do cycle it regularly rarely see a child using it. However, this is not an argument for saying the active travel works are not necessary. Rather it is an argument for forging ahead and providing safe cycling infrastructure to enable more people to choose cycling for themselves and their children. Experience elsewhere has shown that once safe cycling is provided it is extremely popular. We therefore welcome this plan. We feel it’s especially important on a route to a Recreation Area and Sports Centre used by hundreds of adults and children every week. Many of these families, including some of our members live in the Upper Pearse Road area. A safe active travel route to the Park and Sports Centre would benefit families in the housing estates listed above and also those living in the Crozon, Knocknaganny and Caltragh areas. It is not a question of forcing anyone to cycle but of giving them the choice to make short trips by active means. With the increasing popularity of e-bikes many older people are choosing to realise the health benefits of making short trips in this manner.

    Increased road danger following the construction of the Eastern Garavogue Bridge:  Cleveragh Avenue is already busy with cars and HGVs on their way to the Retail Parks and  recreational traffic to the sports centre and park. Once the Eastern Garavogue Bridge is built, the ensuing extra traffic will bring  increased danger for vulnerable road users . The road is likely to become a route of choice for people travelling to and from Sligo University Hospital, ATU and AbbVie. Separating vulnerable road users from traffic  is already necessary but it will become more essential than ever once the volume of traffic increases.

    Apart from the Bridge, the upgrade plan for Cleveragh Park, the consultation on which closed on the 1st of August, includes a proposal for 90 extra car-parking spaces so there is already a plan for increased traffic, some of which will be coming to /from the Tonaphubble Direction.

    Benefit to Drivers: and Residents: This scheme will benefit drivers as well as people walking and cycling.  While the narrowing of the road and the provision of crossings and traffic calming means drivers will move more slowly, the separation of people cycling from other traffic will make driving safer as each mode will have its own space. Slowing down the traffic will also make it easier for drivers exiting from the Sports Centre to turn left or right. Entering or exiting the Sports Centre by any mode is hazardous at present due to the speed of traffic and the lack of traffic calming.  The Centre is extremely busy year round with the Pool, the Gym and the Sports Hall in high demand for classes as well as for individual use, Traffic calming should also be of benefit residents of Cleveragh Avenue. At present it must be difficult for them or for visitors to enter or exit their homes due to the speed of through traffic and with more through traffic envisaged the problem will only get worse. The plans still only envisage a footpath on the Racecourse side of the road whereas the houses are located on the Park side so we imagine residents would welcome a footpath on that section  also.

    Whenever there is a mention of narrowing a road drivers are understandably concerned and feel there will not be enough room. However. we note that the proposal is for a lane width of 3.25 m in each direction and we are assured that is well within the guidelines even for HGVs. We also note that this design is a preliminary one and any issues that arise during the consultation period can be dealt with at the detailed design phase.

    Sligo Woodland School: Sligo Woodland School  was a participant in Sligo Cycling Campaign’s Cycle to Summer Camp initiative this year. Many of the families taking part in the camp lived too far away to get involved but some local children did cycle. They faced the same issue we mentioned earlier, the cycle lane coming to an end before the children arrived at the school. The Woodland Camp, Children’s Community Garden and Sligo LETS are all centred around sustainability but at present neither staff, volunteers or families have a safe sustainable transport route to the Centre..

    Pedestrian and Cyclist Priority at Crossings: One request we have is that the controlled crossings genuinely have pedestrian and cycling priority. The current crossing at the top of Cleveragh Avenue is very responsive with a wait time of about 10 seconds. This contrasts very favourably with the wait time to cross the N4 for example. If enabling walking and cycling is genuinely an aim of the urban area plan and the local transport plan crossings must be responsive to pedestrian and cycling need, It should be noted that drivers using Cleveragh Avenue will be traversing Sligo’s Decarbonisation zone and should not expect a speedy rat-run.

    Road Danger: A full one third of road deaths this year have been of people walking or cycling. A few years ago local media published the story of a teenager who was knocked off his bike at the Sports Centre while he was on his way to kayaking. As far as we are aware the driver was never identified or charged.. Protected infrastructure for people walking and cycling is a vital measure in addressing road danger and encouraging more people to choose active travel for short trips. Given the benefits of cycling for health and wellbeing as well as the freedom and enjoyment it brings and of course the environmental benefits we are pleased to support this active travel project and look forward to its construction and completion.

    There are aspects of the design we feel need tweaking both to comply with the relevant guidelines and to work in practice for people using the route. Our colleagues in the national cycling advocacy organisation, the Irish Cycling Campaign are referring to some of these in their submission and the  IrishCycle.com website has also published a comprehensive analysis with suggestions for improvement..  https://irishcycle.com/2025/08/06/that-cycle-path-looks-really-good-but-the-devil-is-in-the-detail/

     Cycle Parking at the Sports Centre: The current cycle parking at the Sports Centre scores highly for comprising Sheffield stands and for being close to the entrance to the complex which makes it both convenient and secure.  However, it scores poorly in that is not sheltered and it is set in grass rather than concrete. This results in the area becoming wet and muddy and unpleasant to use. We request that the new parking is sheltered and that the stands are set in concrete. Provision needs to be made for the parking of non-standard bikes such as cargo bikes, adult trikes or bikes with child trailers. It is important that there is adequate separation between the stands to allow room for the owner of the bike to lock and unlock it. At Acres Lake for example the extensive bike parking is far too closely placed for two people to be able to lock bikes side by side.

    Communication issues:  We would like to express one further reservation  to our welcome for the proposal.  it is that the presentation of information to the public leaves a lot to be desired. While there is an attractive mock-up on the website of what the scheme might look like, the brochure only contains drawings which are not easily interpreted by the average layperson. Furthermore, the drawings for the most part don’t have cross-sections so even if one can interpret them, they don’t provide enough information. Also, unless one has already signed up to alerts about consultations as we have. it is difficult for the average person to know that the consultation is happening. we are pleased this project is being planned under Section 38 of the Road Traffic Act but it appears to be the case that this means it did not receive the same level pf publicity as a Part 8 Planning Application would.  

    We trust that Sligo County Council will be successful in securing funding for this scheme in particular in view of how much busier the road will become once the EGB is in place. Active Travel funding has been in place since 2020 and while some funding has been allocated to the preliminary work on the Pathfinder Schemes, we are not aware of any new cycle infrastructure that has been provided to date. We acknowledge the provision of extra bike parking around the County.

    Submission sent on behalf of the Committee of Sligo Cycling Campaign

    Joan Swift 

    Chairperson: Sligo Cycling Campaign

     https://www.irishcyclingcampaign.ie/groups/sligo/

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    The attached photos  illustrate

    1.that bikes are parked at the grass Sheffield Stands at the Sports centre throughout the year and are often resting on mud

    2. That it is no longer possible for a driver to recognise a section of painted cycle lane where the paint has faded

    3. That children will and do cycle if the conditions are suitable as illustrated by the success of the Sligo Cycling Campaign Cycle to camp initiative at St Mary's Cúl Camp where on the final day the modal share of children cycling was 39% .    

Attachments

  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13467 - 1 Bikes parked at Sports Centre May.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13468 - 2 bikes parked Sports Centre December.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13469 - 3. Bikes parked Sports Centre February.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13470 - 4 bikes parked Sports Centre October.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13471 - 5 Faded cycle lane cCeveragh Ave.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13472 - 6 Faded cycle lane as before.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13473 - 7 missing cycle lane rough surface.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13474 - 8 64 bikes at St Mary's Cul Camp.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-7-13475 - 9 39 per cent mode share.jpg

Cleaveragh Drive,Sligo Town Section 38 RTA 1994 - Active Travel Scheme

Submitted: 08.08.2025 - 4:37pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-8
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 2
Author: Maura Gilroy
Date Created: 08.08.2025 - 04:33pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    I, Maura Gilroy have resided in Cleaveragh Drive, Sligo since 1967.

     

    My main concerns regarding the Cleaveragh Active Travel Plans are to do with speed of vehicles and the proposed cycle paths and destruction of established hedge rows and mature trees required to accommodate these cycle double paths

     

    I am in favour of designated single cycle lanes but not double or treble widths. 

     

    My daughter Maureen,  has been a resident of Leeds city centre for more than two decades. Over the past six years she tells me that Leeds Council has pursued a determined policy of installing kerbed double cycle lanes all over the city. As a resident of Leeds city centre she has been in position to observe how utilised these cycle lanes are. 

    Leeds Council also provide free e-bikes.

     

    In all that time she has rarely seen cyclists use the designated cycle lanes which take up almost half of the road. On the contrary,  cyclists continue to use either the pedestrian footpaths or the main roads, leaving the cycle paths gloriously empty most of the time. She has never ever seen two cyclists travelling in opposite directions use the paths at the same time.

     

    She asked her husband to take some photographs this week of the cycle paths near where they live. I am attaching some of these photographs and in one, you will see a cyclist typically cycling parallel to the empty double cycle lane. This is the norm. 

     

    The main demographic of the few cyclists there are, consists of men between the ages of 18 and 44. 

     

    These cycle paths have been laid for a considerable time, and yet you still don't see women, young teenagers, children or older men cycling around Leeds.

     

    Effectively only a small proportion percentage of the general population are being catered for to the inconvenience of the majority of the population. 

     

    The "Back Avenue" to the Cleaveragh Desmesne has been tree lined for many decades. From observation, it is enjoyed daily by hundreds of pedestrians as a healthy nature walk, but by relatively few cyclists even though there is an existing painted cycle lane.

     

    Looking at the maps attached the proposals it appears that a wide swathe of road is to be given over to provide a double cycle lane.

     

    In some areas of the map there are three parallel cycle lanes depicted - a double on one side of the and single on the other. 

     

    The mature trees now lining the road are not depicted on the site map of the proposed alterations. Consequently, it is impossible to figure out how many will need to be felled in order to provide a potentially poorly used cycle path. 

     

    The felling of mature trees would be wanton destruction and would greatly diminish the amenity used by so many of the residents of Sligo town. In addition it would be environmentally detrimental for what I perceive as little gain in return in accordance with my daughter's personal experience in Leeds. I believe that were it to become known to Sligo town residents that there was a proposal to fell the trees on the road to from Tonaphubble to the Sports Complex in order to provide a double cycle lane, there would be a public outcry. 

     

    Yours sincerely

     

    Maura Gilroy 

    ?ui=2&ik=ef71cc6274&attid=0.1&th=19879babe343017a&view=fimg&fur=ip&rm=19879babe343017a&sz=w1600-h1000&attbid=ANGjdJ--YScXVJEV1_uF-1fkkz4-vo2E_DvNxwV8r0mV6AHiPCwm4RoMEqdLdcB6FqoiIrOR-Qt_pEbKhH_TwaMiIe_x0gr4yQfZQSEh6kc0t6vD8YP6RsW4flJNLS4&disp=emb&realattid=ii_198799c4992a41842ed1&zw
    ?ui=2&ik=ef71cc6274&attid=0.2&th=19879babe343017a&view=fimg&fur=ip&rm=19879babe343017a&sz=w1600-h1000&attbid=ANGjdJ9z5St-S2J7MpMBoXtsFOzlhEoYzc5kN0RuDAQMZ26l-mGDAY3TR5_56gV72NZGJSkJnVqNPra3VAL1FiESzPBVju4uxVE5ttYH6HcnBhwn8HwJ_BzEdpQ0CgI&disp=emb&realattid=ii_198799caac2a46ccff32&zw

Attachments

  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-8-13504 - IMG-20250804-WA0022.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-8-13505 - IMG-20250804-WA0023.jpg

Cleveragh active travel

Submitted: 10.08.2025 - 7:30pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-9
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 2
Author: Marian Moore
Date Created: 10.08.2025 - 07:26pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    FAO Sligo County Council

     

    I wish to make a submission as a Tonaphubble resident regarding the proposed Active Travel Intervention scheme for Cleaveragh, currently in public consultation. 

     

    While I welcome the safety

    measures introduced, the enormous scale of the project is totally out of proportion to the stated benefits. 

     

    Some stated goals of Sligo County Council are to improve "the current facilities for both

    pedestrians and cyclists", to "encourage active travel", "improve connectivity" and to reduce the

    "environmental impact".

     

    The solution, in a nutshell, is to

    a) Widen the space allocated to vehicular traffic (from approx. 4.5m to 6.5m).

    b) Add safety measures and accessibility (crossings, lighting, traffic calming, protected

    cyclepaths)

    Resulting in

    c) Removal of broad swathes of mature oak, beech trees and others

    d) Removal of wildlife habitats

    Please consider the concerns and questions and suggestions that I have listed below.

     

    Firstly, I would like to agree with the comments and proposals from Rory Noone, Tonaphubble and add the following:-

     

    The addition of a 800m footpath and cycle lane to improve connectivity is going to cause further congestion in an already congested area, especially when you take into account the new entrance to graveyard and the extra traffic during Race days at Cleveragh Racetrack. 

     

    There should be a provision for a car park for Graveyard use as I attach photographs of what is happening now with parking opposite the new entrance to the graveyard. 

     

    The addition of normal traffic on a busy road and extra traffic to Graveyard on this road needs to be factored in. 

     

    There is an aging population living on Tonaphubble Road at present and proposing to put a cycle lane onto the access road as well as negotiating pedestrians, children in buggies, wheelchair users puts an extra pressure on the residents manoeuvring to leave or enter their home. 

     

    By putting pedestrian use on this access area you are putting pressure both on aging population as well as those negotiating buggies and wheelchair user to travel uphill. 

     

    Suggestions

     

    Provide Car Parking for Graveyard use adjacent to new entrance. 

     

    Please Take into account the aging population who live on this road and how difficult it is to enter or leave their property. 

     

    Include EGB traffic impact assessments relevant to Cleaveragh Drive along with the public information on the Cleaveragh Active Travel Scheme.

     

    Prioritize first the most useful parts of a town-wide Active Travel network.

     

    Protect the beauty of amenity we currently have and love.

     

    Enforce the existing speed limits on Cleaveragh Drive. 

     

    Convert the cyclepaths on Cleaveragh Drive into protected cyclepaths.

     

    To summarise, the scale of the project and the details of the proposed changes themselves are out of proportion to, and sometime directly contradict the stated benefits of the project.

     

     Local residents should receive more information in relation to the costs and a justification for both the scale of the project and the destruction of a local amenity. 

Attachments

  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-9-13535 - d47b8b50-9f21-4809-8355-e47b2652ee23.jpeg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-9-13536 - 79a96b72-5c53-4d2e-bebc-aefbe9d6a56f.jpeg

Comments on Active Travel Scheme

Submitted: 13.08.2025 - 3:52pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-10
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 0
Author: Annabel Gilmartin
Date Created: 13.08.2025 - 03:32pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    I am delighted to see this proposal from Sligo County Council. It is of a high standard and should encourage lots of use. 

    I would ask that following on from this, active travel linkages are considered across town to access this useful bit of infrastructure. It will become busy with cyclists of all ages and abilities with the development of Cleveragh Park, and residents from across the other side of town should have safe and useful active travel linkages to get there. 

    I do have some suggestions:

    -can the cycle path be made wider in compliance with the NCM

    -Can the road be narrowed to naturally slow down cars. There will be foot and cycle traffic between the complex and the park which should be made as safe as possible

Comment on Cleveragh Drive Traffic Calming

Submitted: 14.08.2025 - 10:29pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-11
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 0
Author: Joseph Quinn
Date Created: 14.08.2025 - 08:54pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Road safety

    There is a pedestrian crossing, close to the junction of Cleveragh Drive & Tonaphubble Road. It encompasses an always-on green lighting, which I suspect some motorists are confusing with normal traffic lights. I notice some motorists emerging from Cleveragh Drive, competing for space with traffic on the Tonaphubble Road - the latter have the right-of-way. May be deserving of a 2nd look.

  • Theme: 
    Traffic Calming

    Usually, traffic calming encompasses narrowing of a road with concrete structures and signage. Those structures to date are kerbing, enclosing an area of ground. Such kerbing is vertical and hazardous, if / when, an otherwise conscientious driver accidentally glances off  them. Could it be possible to use sloped-away kerbing instead of the vertical kind - the former would look better and be less destructive of a vehicle's steering-alignment, in the event of contact.

Active Travel, Road Design Offices, Sligo County Council regarding Cleveragh Active Travel Interventions Public Consultation July 2025

Submitted: 14.08.2025 - 11:28pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-12
Boundaries Captured on Map: Yes
No. of documents attached: 1
Author: Tonaphubble Residents Association Tonaphubble, Sligo
Date Created: 14.08.2025 - 10:30pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    On behalf of the residents of Tonaphubble and Cleveragh Drive, we wish to express our sincere thanks for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Active Travel Scheme. We appreciate Sligo County Council’s intention to improve walking and cycling infrastructure and acknowledge the broader goals of increased connectivity, accessibility, safety, and environmental sustainability.

    However, following a community meeting held on 31 July 2025 at the Sligo Park Hotel, a number of serious concerns and questions were raised, which we respectfully submit for consideration.

     

Attachments

  • fa-file-pdfSLG-C67-12-13972 - Attachment to SLG-C67-12 Submission - Redacted.pdf

Cleveragh Active Travel Interventions

Submitted: 15.08.2025 - 1:01pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-13
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 0
Author: Therese Barry
Date Created: 15.08.2025 - 12:35pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    FAO Sligo County Council

    CLEVERAGH DRIVE ACTIVE TRAVEL INTERVENTIONS

    To whom it may concern:

    I am making this submission regarding the proposed Active Travel Intervention scheme on behalf of my parents who have been residents of Cleveragh Drive (CD) for over 40 years. In the time they have lived there, there has been huge increase in road traffic, particularly heavy commercial vehicles. At the same time, there has been a more welcome increase in people using the road for daily exercise, including dog-walkers, runners, and parents with young children.

    Our main concern is that the huge scale of the proposed project is totally out of proportion for the location, especially for such a short stretch of foot and cycle paths. At a recent Q&A meeting with the Active Travel Team, it became evident that various road traffic and travel schemes around Sligo, such as this Cleveragh proposal and the Eastern Garavogue Bridge (EGB), are being planned in isolation from each other without any overarching vision or responsibility. Along the short 800m stretch of road in the proposed Cleveragh scheme, there are different bodies with responsibility and budgets for Active Travel, on-road changes such as crossings, footpaths, speed limits, etc. with nobody taking overall responsibility for ensuring an optimum outcome.

    Although the stated intent is to link cycle lanes to encourage active travel, there are no lanes on Tonaphubble Road (TR) to link to, nor do there seem to be any immediate plans to add any apart from a short 50m stretch on TR. With so much housing on the Tonaphubble and Pearse Road side of CD, adding cycle lanes along TR and Cleveragh Road should be the main priority since they form the shortest routes from these residential areas into town and to schools. 

    Rather than proceed with a costly, environmentally damaging, and potentially dangerous project, we recommend that the proposed scheme be rejected in favour of measures that will effectively reduce traffic speed along CD, and thereby increase safety and amenity for cyclists, residents, and others. 

    As residents, our main concerns regarding the proposed scheme relate to: (1) safety, and (2) the environmental impact.

    1. Safety

    Cycle lane

    While some of the proposed safety measures are to be welcomed, the scheme is likely to make it more dangerous for CD residents. There is no footpath along most of the residential side of the road and no proposal to include one in the new scheme. The proposed scheme would add a two-way cycle path to an already busy and dangerous stretch of road, leading to increased risk to residents needing to cross the road to access a footpath. E-bikes and scooters can travel at high speeds and, being quieter than cars and heavier than bicycles, can present a considerable danger to pedestrians. A raised-kerb cycle path would make it more difficult to access the footpath for people with limited mobility or pushing buggies.

    At the Q&A meeting, it was suggested that the Active Travel planners would look at the scheme in terms of the greater benefit of more active travel (i.e., increased numbers of cyclists) versus the small number of houses along the road. While there are only a few houses along CD, they are almost all without a footpath on their side of the road, meaning the residents are already at risk when crossing to the existing footpath. Increasing the risk of death or injury for anyone should not form any part of a scheme intended to improve safety and accessibility. Waiting for something to happen before an obvious safety issue can be addressed is not an acceptable approach.

    Speed

    There are no proposed physical measures to reduce speed between the racecourse entrance and the TR junction and, based on current usage, traffic is likely to accelerate along this stretch. The apparent theory is that narrowing of the road will lead to a psychological effect on drivers to reduce their speed. However, the existing road is already quite narrow and this appears to have no impact on speed mitigation. Traffic along CD regularly exceeds the 50 km/h speed limit, particularly around the corner between the TR junction and the Sports Complex (travelling in both directions). Given the noted deterioration in driving standards in recent years, there is a real concern that the road-narrowing theory is unlikely to have the intended effect.

    Suggestions:

    1. Introducing – and enforcing - a lower speed limit on CD would have a greater impact on safety and encouraging active travel than the huge intervention proposed. 
    2. Adding a footpath along the residential side of the road and another raised crossing between the racecourse and the TR junction should be an integral part of any proposed scheme. 

    2. Environmental Impact

    Cleveragh Drive is currently a lovely road lined with mature trees which gives a sense of being in the countryside although very close to town. For many people, this is the main reason to walk and run along the road. The new footpath would necessitate removal of many mature trees and greatly reduce the public amenity of the route – it may even lead to a reduction in active leisure use as it would become just another an urban footpath along a busy road.

    The existing tree canopy and undergrowth form a critical wildlife corridor for foxes, badgers, red squirrels, birds, and hosts of other creatures. Replacement of mature trees with managed landscaping will not make up for such loss of wildlife and biodiversity. The negative environmental impact would far outweigh any proposed benefit.

    With the predicted increase in road traffic directed towards CD from the EGB, the appeal of the route to cyclists is also likely to be reduced.  A small kerb between the road and cycle lane will not feel like much protection from heavy commercial vehicles and speeding cars on such a narrow route.

    The fear is that a unique natural resource for Sligo will be irreversibly destroyed at huge environmental (and financial) cost without any identifiable environmental or social benefit.

    Suggestion:

    Before any scheme is approved:

    1. a full environmental impact assessment should be carried out, in conjunction with County Sligo Biodiversity Working Group.
    2. The traffic impact of the EGB and its likely effect on active travel along CD and related routes should be determined.

    Conclusion

    The proposed scheme should be rejected on safety and environmental grounds, and a full impact assessment of the increased traffic effect from the EGB should be carried out before any future scheme is designed.

    Regards 

    Thérèse Barry (on behalf of Gerald and Maureen Barry, [Redacted - Personal Information])

     

Cleveragh Drive Active Travel

Submitted: 15.08.2025 - 2:32pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-14
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 1
Author: Irish Cycling Campaign (formerly Cyclist.ie)
Date Created: 15.08.2025 - 02:31pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    Please find attached PDF submission on behalf of the Irish Cycling Campaign

Attachments

  • fa-file-pdfSLG-C67-14-13970 - Attachment to SLG-C67-14 Submission - Redacted.pdf

Support for Cleveragh Avenue Section 38 Scheme

Submitted: 15.08.2025 - 3:15pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-15
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 3
Author: Joan Swift
Date Created: 15.08.2025 - 02:09pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Road safety

    I live on Cairns Road and try to make as many short journeys as possible by bike.  I cycle regularly to the Sports Centre via Cleveragh Avenue to attend classes and I frequently cycle home from town via the Riverside and Cleveragh so as to enjoy the views and the quieter route.  I am very happy with the various elements of Sligo County Council's plans to make the route safe for all modes.  Completion of the separated cycle lane, pedestrian crossings and traffic calming are all  necessary now and will be even more necessary as the route becomes busier following the construction of the Eastern Garavogue Bridge.

    At present I have a safe permeable route through Markievicz, Heather View and Meadowvale as far as Holy Well Road. However, once I turn right at the Cleveragh junction I only have a painted cycle lane separating me from fast moving traffic until I reach the entrance to the Racecourse. After that, there is a separated cycle route as far as the Sports Centre but it  is on the opposite side of the road and there is no safe way to cross  over with traffic moving fast down the hill and obscured by the bend in the opposite direction. When returning home the situation is reversed.  I start on the separated cycle infrastructure but get thrown out onto the road again opposite the Racecourse and must share the road with traffic as far as the junction.  

    I use this infrastructure currently but without intervention it will become increasingly unsafe as the volume of traffic increases. Also  such  piecemeal infrastructure is never going to attract new cyclists, something which is necessary  if the County is to meet its climate and sustainability targets. The County also has an Age-Friendly Strategy and the current cycling infrastructure is neither child-friendly or age-friendly.

    Drivers are not well served by the current lay-out of Cleveragh Avenue either.  If I drive to the Sports Centre it is difficult  and stressful to exit  because of the speed of oncoming traffic and in general I need to watch out that I don't encroach on the painted cycle lane.  Calming the traffic and giving each mode its own space will make for a safer experience for all road users. I occasionally visit The Woodland School and I imagine the same applies to entering and exiting  there and to the various homes located on the Avenue.

    I was a Public Participation Network Environment Rep on Sligo County Council's Environment and Infrastructure Special Purposes Committee during the term of the previous Council.  During that time the question of access to the new bridge arose from time to time and members were assured the bridge was intended to be used by local traffic only.  It was never clarified how this would be ensured but  this section 38, including narrowing the road, calming the traffic and installing pedestrian crossings should  go a long way to ensure the road is not an attractive route for through traffic for the N16. The volume of local traffic will still be substantial given the major trip destinations just across the bridge, ie Sligo University Hospital, Atlantic Technological University and Abbvie. Given all of this traffic will be passing through a residential and recreational area it is essential it is not permitted to do so at high speeds and the availability of an active travel option for the trip will be safer for people walking, cycling or driving.

    I also welcome the other element of the scheme, that is the proposal to upgrade the cycle parking at the Sports Centre.  The current Sheffield Stands, while useful, are unsatisfactory as they are set in grass which becomes muddy after rain and they also offer no shelter from the elements,. This parking needs to cater for non standard and adapted bikes as well as standard ones.

    In conclusion I welcome this scheme and hope Sligo County Council is successful in obtaining funding . I look forward to seeing the detailed design in due course. The attachments  I am adding are of bike parking at the Sports Centre   including an adult trike where it is clear the space does not accommodate it and  if it rains the user will return to a wet bike. They also show the muddy grass which again is unpleasant to stand on while locking and unlocking one's bike. 

Attachments

  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-15-13680 - 20250121_115934.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-15-13679 - Oct 24 20241003_095846.jpg
  • fa-file-imageSLG-C67-15-13681 - Oct 24 20241010_100259.jpg

Submission on Proposed Active Travel Scheme at Cleveragh Drive, Sligo

Submitted: 05.09.2025 - 1:03pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-16
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 1
Author: Sligo Races
Date Created: 05.09.2025 - 12:58pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    Please see attached submission

Attachments

  • fa-file-pdfSLG-C67-16-13975 - Submission - Sligo Races.pdf

Submission on Proposed Active Travel Scheme at Cleveragh Drive, Sligo

Submitted: 05.09.2025 - 1:16pm
Unique Reference Number: SLG-C67-17
Boundaries Captured on Map: No
No. of documents attached: 1
Author: Anita & Don O'Connor
Date Created: 05.09.2025 - 01:13pm
Status: Submitted

Observations

  • Theme: 
    Active Travel

    Please see attached submission

Attachments

  • fa-file-pdfSLG-C67-17-13976 - Submission - Anita O'Connor - Redacted.pdf